I intended to write a post on the Pope, including his autism vis-à-vis the world that hides racism it seems to hide in rehabilitating the cream of fundamentalist / deniers. But it seems that typing on the pope, it's easy and its supporters remain firmly rooted in society, including Marine Le Pen, who flew to the aid of the bishop of Rome. Mind you, with friends like that, we can understand why Catholicism has a proud history of military victories but a rather bleak future. Which would remove even the legions to the Vatican? Richard Millet, who fought alongside the Phalangists during the war in Lebanon, regrets and no shortage of spit on as usual in the decadent West Point :
How can you be a Christian of the East! Occidental said the de-Christianized, sitting on his Social Security and believes that the world is limited the democratic bliss. (...)
In vain do we expect the outrage of mourners from Europe or the United Unis.Toute peace, even the pseudo-peace of the brave, assumes a defeated, which can not be Jews or Muslims, or even the Kurds, who have regained their territory. Is it legitimate to think out any conspiracy theory but according to the mechanism of the scapegoat Discount Girard, whether it be Christian, as a whole, to be sacrificed on the altar of peace in the Middle East? (...)
In truth, we dig our own graves: the plight of Eastern Christians is an example of what happens when we deny the spiritual world. The invisible is not just a case of ghosts or the original reducible to genetics alone. Enter a church of the East, you will hear what the silence of the churches of the West you cache: the rustle of angels. It is we, Europeans, who, having refused to include in the Constitution of the Christian character of our roots, let us be programmed eradication, and already effective: emptied of Christians either of its components are often more educated, more open, more modern, the region is Muslim, with the exception of Israel.
The text of an "intellectual" concern at the highest point a few days of Durban II. Millet resume the old theses of the French far right, against the decadent West for hostility against Muslims and Jews and an elite culture (see the little swipe at Social Security) in a The Point newspaper as speaks volumes about the climate of hate in which we swim. The time is appropriate, the times are "uncertain" as journalists say, and "Crisis" pushes us every day more and more in the sense that it is important to find the culprits. For DSK, who heads the very leftist IMF is greed that is responsible for the crisis, which is funny when you think that this man wants every woman to him and not only from that used yet very good soup policies some time ago. For others, it is the fault of the traders, who have received their money, however small punters too happy to do a somersault on UCITS. But reading Millet, among other minor prophets, we realize that Durban II in Geneva come to the same conclusion that I in Durban in September 2001, just before the attack World Trade Center: blame the Jews.
So should we go to Durban II in April? Israel is boycotting course, and the United States, Canada and Italy. Rama Yade think we should go there to fight, and the minister seems to be right: the United Nations remains a wonderful idea, but it must be defended from within. Small dictators have learned to use the UN as a forum and to play on the net to avoid being too interested in their fiefdoms. Omar al Bashir speaks about his Zionist conspiracy charge, and of course it is joined in this theory by his progressive friends like Egypt. Not sure that Christians have done better, Mr. Millet. Anti-Semitism was not invented by Muslims, nor by Christians, but he remains the last refuge of fools looking everywhere guilty to their misfortune, carefully avoiding to ask questions about themselves .
0 comments:
Post a Comment