Masterbatng With My Sister

I just saw Religulous, a film with pretensions animated documentary by Bill Maher, comedy American liberal. We see much religious morons, all confident of having answers to existential questions, and Maher is a joy to pass them off as enlightened, which is not very difficult. The problem is that like all atheists, including me, Maher has no trouble showing that religions entrap the simple-minded, but this gives him the feeling of being intellectually superior. This is indeed the problem of atheists always caused by the stupidity of religions, we often think it is enough to show their irrationality to feel good then it should help believers overcome their psychosis. Movies like Religulous or works of Richard Dawkins are like the sermons in the churches: they only serve to convince the unconvinced.

What can serve the initiative of buses operating in London and announced that God probably does not exist? It is easy in the West do not believe in a deity, most often because we are given the choice, but also because life is better than in most countries. We can understand someone who is facing terrible material hardship and can only surrender to the faith not to become crazy. But in the West? How to understand that millions of people accept without thinking the idea that a woman gave birth without copulating, that his son is not really his son is also a god, he comes to earth from nowhere for a suicide mission, and to celebrate his birth, which falls is historically another day was erected in the home a Christmas tree emblematic of Galilee (!!??) by offering children toys made in China while eating chestnuts (!!!!?????). Not to mention other religions that rival any of preposterous inventions to unite the faithful. And the most amusing is that each believes hold the Truth, while the rest are abominations!

The New scandal shakes the Catholic Church is as always an unnamed hypocrisy. Ben XVI reinstates the fundamentalists and the public focuses on the case of a prelate who denies the Holocaust, thereby claiming that the Catholic Church it would be blameless in regard to the systematic destruction of European Jews by the Third Reich. The Vatican's propaganda machine running at full speed. We give a bone to the media and public opinion (Richard Williamson, who appears as a mentally retarded or a bastard, it depends), everyone is outraged that a clergyman could be denial while n is neither the first nor the last and avoids talking about the fundamentalists who are 150 000 communicates back within the Catholic Church in a reactionary movement undeniable. Knowing he will not attract new parishioners by Protestantism, Ben XVI returns to what made the success of his organization: rules so restrictive that they can only lead to transgression. Commit the forbidden, which most delicious sin for a monk? Do what you did not morally right to do, what a wonderful feeling when you know that paying a small fee and some kneeling, we're still going to paradise! In fact, what fate is reserved by religions to atheists like me? Hell, the suffering, not eternal damnation? And I'm the intolerant? :)

Man And Woman Figurine Lamp

Beirut, the capital of love

The good news is piling up for Lebanon. Having been featured in the NY Times, which says that Beirut is The Place to Be in 2009, is now a Georgian politician who just say all the good he must think the neighbor of Syria (Nahar):

Visiting Georgian Deputy Prime Giorgi Baramidze Said history has a country to learn lot from Lebanon.
"For us Lebanon Is an example to Be Followed. That Is Why We Say We Have A Lot to learn from it, "He Said followings historical meeting Minister Tareq Mitri With Information.

" There are Many SIMILARITIES Between Georgia and Lebanon. We Georgians Suffer from HAVING shares of Our Country Under occupation by Russia. We wish to ESTABLISH a good dialogue With Our neighbors have Lebanon Does With Its Own neighbors, "the Georgian official said.


I know very little Georgia, all I do is drink shots with Georgians in Bratislava and in general, without my knowing exactly why, it is referred to Houellebecq. With this experience, I conclude nonetheless that the Georgian politician who says we should follow the example of Lebanon regarding his handling of dialogue with neighboring countries can only be a merry prankster. Or it is a little drunk at the time of the interview. Or maybe it was the wrong country and that Holland evokes. Or that it was he who wrote the article in the NY Times.

Because in terms of neighbors, the Egyptians are pushing Hamas to accept a "package deal" (according to Yediot Aharonot) with Israel and fissa. The reason is simple: during the next elections to the Knesset, the next prime minister is likely to be Bibi Netanyahu sinister, and he will surely have a solution for peace seriously disproportionate this time. At the same time, we can understand the Israelis. As individuals they choose "moderate" to try to stop attacks against Israel, they take precautions, moultes assaults, like calling the inhabitants of a building that will be destroyed or try not to bombard civilians. In return, the world public opinion compared to the Nazis, parallel intelligent and relevant which shows the cultural level of those who parade through the streets of Paris for peace in the world, but the Jews who, as everyone knows, are drunk of violence and bloodshed as Hamas loves children and shawarma. So this time, Binyamin Netanyahu is likely to pass because he does not see much use for being spit on and it was found that Hamas had no time to fight against the military prefers to launch rockets on civilians. It certainly will not solve the problems (though) but at least the Israeli policy will be more readable. And Georgia will be a great model of coexistence among peoples as well offer it knows if the Middle East. So as we advise the NY Times and Baramidze: in 2009, all in Beirut!

What makes me think that I have a talent that can not take away: I had to choose the loser nose (e) s. Segolene Royal, Hillary Clinton Tzipi Livni ... That said, it's not very difficult: curiously, in an election is always a man who triumphs. Is there a link between the sex of candidates and their election chances?